D.P.GUPTA, R.L.GUPTA
Sumitra Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Authorised Officer (Sub-Divisional Officer) Shri Ganganagar – Respondent
2. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner received a large chunk of agricultural land from her father and out of the aforesaid land she transferred parcels of land to various persons including her husband, her three sons and her daughter by means of registered sale deeds executed on different dates. Proceedings under sec. 11 of the Act where started against the petitioner and her husband by the Authorised Officer (Ceiling), Sri Ganganager and both of them on receiving notices under sub-sec. (1) of sec. 11 filed their returns. After an enquiry the Authorised Officer came to the conclusion that the youngest son of the petitioner, Gurusharan Singh, was a minor and the transfer of land in favour of the aforesaid minor son by the petitioner on December 19, 1972 could not be recognised for the purposes of determination of the ceiling area applicable to the petitioner and her husband and by his order dated August
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.