SEN, J.—This is a defendants revision under sec 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act 1950 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) directed against the judgment and decree of Additional Civil Judge No. 2, Bharatpur, camp Gangapur, dated October 3, 1970, reversing the judgment and decree of the Munsif, Hindaun, dated May 18,1966, and decreeing the plaintiffs suit under sec. 6 of the Act, whereby the learned Additional Civil Judge has decreed the plaintiffs claim reducing the rent of two shops in Hindaun from Rs. 80/- per mensem to Rs 20/- per mensem.

2. This litigation has had a chequered career. The parties are closely related and also stand in the relation of landlord and tenant. The demised premises comprise of two shops in the heart of business locality of Hindaun. Joharilals daughter was married to Ram Sahai, father of Kapoor Chand, while Jagdish Prasad who is another daughters son of Johari Lal, was taken in adoption by him. Kapoor Chands father Ram Sahai baing in indigenous circumstances, Joharilal brought the family to Hindaun and set them up in business. The demised premises were given to Ram Sahai in St. year 1987 for starting a business, and Joha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document