SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Raj) 124

SHARMA
Ajayab Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R Bajwa, for Petitioner; K.C. Bhandari, Public Prosecutor, for State; Bhim Raj Purohit, for Arjun, Singh, Complainant.

SHARMA, J.—Ajayab Singh and Ram Pratap have invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court by way of an application under secs. 397 read with sec. 401, Cr.P.C. against an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sri, Ganganagar, in Sessoins Case No. 76 of 1976, State vs. Succha Singh and others. By this order the Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application presented by Arjunsingh complainant for summoning the petitioners to his court lor trial together with the other accused for the offences punishable under secs. 336 I.P.C. and sec. 27 of the Arms Act, which they appeared to have committed.

2. The short facts giving rise to this rivision petition may be stated as follows:—

Arjun Singh son of Dutta Singh Jat Sikh resident of 58 G.B. lodged a verbal report with the police at police station, Anupgarh, District Sri, Ganganagar on 24th May, 1975, at about 3 30 p.m. It was alleged in the report that his son Gajjan Singh had gone to his fields on the back of a mare in the morning on 24th May, 1975 Ajayab Singh accompanied by his associates, namely, Succha Singh, Hardayal Singh Nirmal Singh, Avtar Singh and Ram Pratap followed his son for the purpose of giving him a beating. Gajj













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top