JOSHI
Bhikha Bhai – Appellant
Versus
Lalshanker – Respondent
2. The respondent was served with summons along with the copy of the election petition including annexures and affidavit. The respondent No. 1 submitted his written statement and along with his written statement produced the copy of the election petition sent to him along with the summons. In his written statement respondent No. i traversed all the allegations in regard to the commission of corrupt practices and inter alia contended that the copy of the election petition along with the annexures served on him, do not contain the attestation of the petitioner under his own signature that it is a true copy of the original petition as required by section 81(3) of the Act. It was further contended that the copy of the election petition suppli
(3) Khub Chand vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1967 SC 1074 at page 1077)
(6) Anup Singh vs. Abdul Ghani (AIR 1965 SC 815)
(8) Jagat Kishore vs. Rajendra Kumar (AIR 1971 SC 342)
(9) Satya Narain vs. Dhuja Ram (AIR 1974 SC 1185)
(15) Virendra Singh vs. Vimal Kumar (AIR 1976 SC 2169)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.