SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Raj) 20

SHRIMAL, JAIN
Nandlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L. Pareek, for Appellants.

SHRIMAL J.—These two special appeals Nos, 47 and 49 of 1977, preferred by Nand Lal and Ganesh Lal, under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, are directed against the order, delivered in Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 1507 of 1976 and 1508 of 1976 on October 26, 1977, rejecting the writ peti-tions challenging the validity of the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority, dated August 27, 1976, holding that the transfers of the surplus land, transfer of which was. made after December 31, 1969, had no right of hearing and consequantly the appeals filed by then were not maintainable.

2. The facts giving rise to these special appeals are that the Sub Divisional Officer, Kota, (vide his order, dated July 12, 1976) refused to recognise the transfer of land made in favour of the appellants as the sale-deeds were executed after December 31, 1969 and the Sub-Divisional Officer further held that Bakhtawar Singh was liable to surrender 339.76 standard acres of land, being surplus land. He was given an option to select for himself and his sons land within the ceiling limit which he wanted to retain. It was urged that the Khatedar-tenant while exercising the option given to him incl













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top