SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Raj) 86

S.K.M.LODHA, LODHA
Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
Chunnilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Mehta, for Petitioner; A.K. Mathur, for Non-Petitioner-No. 1; R.P. Dave, for Non-Petitioner No. 2.

LODHA, J.—This revision has been preferred by Mangilal, Basant Kumar and Shantilal who are sons of Bhanwarlal (employer and opposite party No. 1 before the Workmens Compensation Commissioner. Udaipur Region, Udaipur) and is directed against the order dated May 5, 1977 passed by the Workmens Compensation Commissioner, Udaipur Region, Udaipur on an application dated November 3, 1976 under section 47 Civil Procedure Code.

2. A few frets deserve recall here. One Shri Chunnilal son of Shri Paras Ram resident of Nai, Tehsil Girawa. District Udaipur preferred two claims under the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (for short the Act) before the Workmens Compensation Commissioner, Udaipur Region, Udaipur, who will hereinafter be referred to as the Commissioner on the ground that on July 13, 1972 Smt. Ganeshi wife of Chunnilal (applicant No 1 before the Commissioner) and Kumari Narbada daughter of Chunnilal (applicant No 2 before the Commissioner) died because of the accident. He field two claims for compensation against Bhanwarlal (employer) and Ambalal son of Bharaji (Contractor-opposite party No.2 before the Commissioner) for payment of compensation of Rs 14,000/-i.e. Rs. 7,000/- on account
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top