G.M. LODHA, J.—This special appeal arises from the judgment of the single bench in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 726 of 1978, dated 24-10-78 by which the writ petition has been dismissed. Mr. Sharma has prayed that in this special appeal the petitioner-appellant may be allowed the following reliefs :

"(a) declaring the following provisions of laws to be void ab-initio, or

ultra vires, (i) Secs. 4, 8, 8-A, 9, 11,33(3) and 146 of the Representation

of the People Act, 1951 to the extent they are contrary and inconsistent with the provisions of Arts. 13, 14, 16, 19(a), 19(g), sub-clause (6) of Arts. 19, 31-c, Art. 39 read with Art. 37, Arts. 102, 103, 105, 122, and the preamble of the Constitution as argued above;

(ii) Secs. 24 and 25 of the Advocates Act, 1961 to the extent they are contrary and inconsistent with 19(g), sub-clause (6) of Art. 19, Art. 29, Art. 31-C, Art. 39 read with 37 of the Constitution and secs. 7 and 29 of the Police Act, 1861 as also against the proviso of Art. 309 and the Rules framed thereunder;

(ii) Provisions of Rules 14, 16, 19 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1958, framed under the proviso of Art 309 of the Constitution

Click Here to Read the rest of this document