DWARKA PRASAD, J.—This appeal was taken up for hearing today on the request of the learned counsel for the parties. The facts, which have given rise to this appeal, may be briefly stated :

2. Surendra Mohan, appellant, filed a suit in the Court of District Judge, Jaipur City for partition of the movable and immovable properties and for possession of all movable and immovable properties falling to his share and also for rendition of accounts of income during the last 12 years. The case of the plaintiff was that Ramnarain had two sons, Pyarelal and Radhamohan. Radha Mohan expired leaving his widow Smt. Panni Bai, defendant No. 3, and son Surendra Mohan, plaintiff, and three daughters, Smt. Kamla Devi, Smt. Sushila Devi and Smt. Pushplatadevi. Pyarelal, defendant No. Misalleged to have adopted Brijmohan, natural son of Radhamohan, who is defendant No. 2 in the suit and the wife of Brijmohan Smt. Sheelarani is defendant No. 4 in the suit. According to the plaintiff. Pyarelal, defendant No. 1, had share in the suit properties while defendant No. 2 Brijmohan and defendant No. 3 Smt Pannibai had 1/4 share each, while the plaintiff had the remaining 1/4 share in all the movable and immovabl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document