N.M.KASLIWAL
Ramesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Mukhtyar Singh – Respondent
2. Brief facts leading to this revision are that the plaintiff-non-petitioner Himmat Singh filed a suit for declaration that the suit property mentioned in para No. 1 of the plaint belonged to him and a sale-deed made by defendants No. 1 and 2 in favour of defendant No. 3 be declared null and void against the plaintiff. It has further been prayed that the possession on the suit property be delivered to the plaintiff from the defendants. One Shri Mohanlal alleging himself to be a Pujari of Shri Satya Sahib Birajman Mandir Shri Satya Sahib Kumbher filed an application under O. 1 R. 10 C. P. C. for impleading Shri Satya Sahib Birajman Mandir Shri Satya Sahib Kumbher as a party in the suit on the ground that the suit property belonged to the applicant and was in his possession and that the plaintiff was neither the owner of the suit property nor was in possession. It was further pleaded that the sui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.