SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 17

MAHENDRA BHUSHAN
B. R. Oil Mills – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Engineer (D) R. S. E. B. , Bharatpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P. Goyal, for Petitioner; H.P. Gupta, for Non-petitioners.

MAHENDRA BHUSHAN, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus or a direction or order with a prayer that the order of the respondents (Annexure-1) repeated in Annexure-5 be quashed and the non-petitioner (1) be restrained by a rule of this Court from executing the order (Annx. 3) of non-petitioner(2), and further that the non-petitioner be restrained from disconnecting the supply of energy to the petitioner so long as the petitioner makes the payment of electricity charges consumed by him.

2. M/s B.R. Oil Mills, petitioner, is a registered partnership concern carrying on business at Bharatpur and extracts oil from oil seeds by the machinery fixed in it. The petitioner is a high tension consumer of the non-petitioner (2), and he applied to the non-petitioners for providing the high tension power in the year 1962. The same was provided to the petitioner and the petitioner is regularly paying the amount as per bills for the electricity consumed by him, and it is not disputed by the non-petitioners. The petitioner furnished National Saving Certificates of the value of Rs. 5,000/- towards security for making the payment of monthly electricity

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top