P.D.KUDAL
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ramkishan @ Sufan – Respondent
2. The breif facts which have given rise to the present reference are that a challan was submitted against the accused Ram Kishan and Haboo under section 127 of the Railways Act. The learned Magistrate by his order dated 14.4.1979 submitted the case before the learned Sessions Judge, Kota, who transferred the same to the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, by his order dated 17.8.1979. Before this, by order dated 24.5.1976. the learned Sessions Judge transferred this case to the Court of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kota, but later on, vide order dated 15.7.1976, this case was transferred to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kota as the accused were children. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge vide his order dated 22.9.1979, held that under section 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code only those offences are to be tried by him which are either punishable with imprisonment for life or with death sentence, and all other cases are to be tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate dealing with the children cases. The offience under section 127 of Railways Act is punishable with imprisonment for life. The learn
(2) Jugalkishore vs. Raw Cotton Co. (AIR 1955 SC 376)
(3) Rajanayaya Singh vs. Baijnath Singh (AIR 1954 SC 749)
(4) Amar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1955 SC 504)
(5) Hira Devi vs. District Board
(6) Malinakhya vs. Shyam Sunder (AIR 1953 SC 148)
(7) Mamleshwar vs. Kanahiya Lal (AIR 1975 SC 907)
(8) Indramani vs. W.R. Natu (AIR 1963 SC 274)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.