SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 29

G.M.LODHA
Nagar Parishad, Alwar – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Lahari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P. Goyal, for Appellant; H.C. Rastogi & J.P. Goyal, for Respondent.

G.M. LODHA, J —This is an appeal by Municipal Council, Alwar against the Judgment of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar in criminal case No. 18/257/ 74 acquitting the respondent for offence under section 7 read with section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

2. The prosecution case is that on 11.6.1972 Food Inspector Hanuman Modi inspected the shop of accused in Munshi Bazar. He suspected adulteration in chillies and took samples. These samples were put in three bottles and sealed. One bottle was given to the accused and was sent for public analysis. According to the report of Public Analyst Ex. P.3. it was found that the chillies were adulterated.

3. In support of the case the prosecution has examined P.W. 1 Hanuman Modi and PW. 2 Omprakash and P.W. 3 Kuldeep Kumar. The accused denied the taking of the sample and produced DW 1 Bhagwan Das and D.W 2 Yograj Dixit. The trial court considered the evidence produced by the parties and found that the sample was taken from the accused. It was also found that Omprakash and Kuldeep Kumar were hostile witnesses On ulterior discussion of the entire evidence a finding was given that even though the two witnesses P.W.2 and PW3 hav

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top