N.M. KASLIWAL, J — This writ petition by the petitioners Chhaganlal and Hukam Chand under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against (he judgment of the Board of Revenue dated December 21, 1981.

2. The brief facts leading to this writ petition are that a declaration was filed by Chhakanlal and his brother Gopal regarding their land under the ceiling proceedings. In the said declaration Chhaganlal had declared Hukam-Chand as his grand-son. Gopal had also not mentioned that Hukam Chand was his adopted son. The matter went upto the Board of Revenue and the case was remanded by the Board of Revenue with the direction that the question whether Hukamchand was the adopted son of Gopal should be decided after making enquiry in this regard. After the remand of the case the petitioners led oral and documentary evidence and the learned Assistant Collector Baran after taking into consideration the entire evidence arrived at the conclusion that the petitioners had not proved the adoption of Hukam Chand, The appeal filed by the petitioners was also dismissed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, and the Board of Revenue by the impugned judgment dated December 21, 1981, uphold the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document