G.M.LODHA
Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Bundi – Respondent
2. A departmental inquiry was instituted against the petitioner in the year 1975. In that inquiry, the two charges levelled against the petitioner and, after the inquiry they were found to be proved.
3. According to the inquiry report, the inquiry officer was of the opinion that the following two charges were proved —
^^;g gS fd dj.kflag iVokjh us iVokj e.My vUFkM+k esa iVokjh in ij dk;Z djrs gq, Jh Hkksikyflag o y{e.k flag jktiwr xzke cFkokM+k esa 1402@& :i;s olwy djds ml jkfk dk fl;kgk esas vey ugha djds vigj.k fd;kA 2- ;g gS fd Jh dj.kflag us jlhn la- 25752@14 dh r`rh; izfr Jh j?kqukFk oxSjg tkV ftudh vksj ls 10-06 iSls tek gq, Fks dks ugha nsdj vius ikl j[kh rFkk bl r`rh; izfr ij Åijh ys[ku djrs gq, vkjksi la[;k izFke esa of.kZr jkfk dk vadu djds Jh Hkksikyflag o y{e.kflag ds olwy kqnk 1402 :- dh mUgsa QthZ jlhn cukdj ns nhA bl izdkj Jh dj.kflag us Jh Hkksikyflag o y{e.kflag ds lkFk /kks[kk ?kM+h dhA
4. In the inquiry, the evidence of Laxman Singh, Raghunathsingh, Govind Singh a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.