G.M.LODHA, G.K.SHARMA
Lalloo Lal – Appellant
Versus
District & Sess. Judge Jaipur, Distt. Jaipur – Respondent
2. The appellant has made prayer that this Court should issue a writ or direction, allow the writ petition and, quash and set aside the orders dated 9.4.70,3.4.76, 28.5.81, 4/6-1.82, 25.1.82, 8.7.82, and 19.11.82 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur declaring the petitioner-appellant as Tout and to remove the petitioners name from the list of touts as well as from notice Board of the courts and; declare Section 36 of the Legal Practitioner Act as ultravires, arbitrary and illegal, and, allow the appellant to work as Munshi.
3 The relief and prayer clause, itself, shows that the petitioner has jumbled up seven orders passed by the learned District Judge and, the writ petition, itself, therefore, clearly suffers from misjoinder of various causes of action and, that too, relating to a period of 12 years back. In fact, it is clear that the writ was not maintainable on this ground, alone.
4. A brief resume of the history of the case further show
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.