SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 99

G.M.LODHA, G.K.SHARMA
Lalloo Lal – Appellant
Versus
District & Sess. Judge Jaipur, Distt. Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Purohit & Chhabilal Sharma, for Appellant

G.M. LODHA, J.—Lalloolal, the appellant, has filed this special appeal under S. 18 of the Rajasthatn High Court Ordinance against the judgment of the learned Single Judge whe dismissed the writ petition of the appellant, in limine.

2. The appellant has made prayer that this Court should issue a writ or direction, allow the writ petition and, quash and set aside the orders dated 9.4.70,3.4.76, 28.5.81, 4/6-1.82, 25.1.82, 8.7.82, and 19.11.82 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur declaring the petitioner-appellant as Tout and to remove the petitioners name from the list of touts as well as from notice Board of the courts and; declare Section 36 of the Legal Practitioner Act as ultravires, arbitrary and illegal, and, allow the appellant to work as Munshi.

3 The relief and prayer clause, itself, shows that the petitioner has jumbled up seven orders passed by the learned District Judge and, the writ petition, itself, therefore, clearly suffers from misjoinder of various causes of action and, that too, relating to a period of 12 years back. In fact, it is clear that the writ was not maintainable on this ground, alone.

4. A brief resume of the history of the case further show









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top