SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 214

N.M.KASLIWAL
Sawita – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Prakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Parag Rastogi, for Petitioner; B.P. Gupta, for Non-petitioner.

N.M. KASLIWAL, J.—The petitioner Smt Sawita has filed this transfer petition under s. 24 C.P.C. read with sec. 21-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for transferring Case No. 133/83: Chandra Prakash vs. Smt. Sawita, pending in the court of District Judge, Bharatpur, to the court at Jaipur and to consolidate the same with Case No. 130/83, pending in the court of District Judge, Jaipur City Jaipur.

2. Brief facts leading to this petition are: that Smt. Sawita, the petitioner was married to Chandra Prakash, the non-petitioner, on 27.11.82 at Jaipur according to Hindu rites. The case of the petitioner is that after their marriage, the parties lived together at Bhusawar upto 21.8.83. Before the marriage, the petitioners father had given Rs. 21000/- and other valuable articles including jewellery to the non-petitioner. The non petitioner and his father wanted to have a Scooter from the petitioners father. This demand could not be met. Thus, after few months of the marriage, the non-petitioner and his father started mal-treating the petitioner and on her refusal to bring scooter, her life was made miserable and she became sick. It has been further allege





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top