GOPAL KRISHNA SHARMA, J.—This revision petition is preferred against the judgment of Additional Civil Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, dated 15th Jan.. 81, by which he confirmed the judgment passed by the Munsif, Jaipur District, Jaipur, dated 24th May, 80.

2. Birdhichand and Jankivallabh filed a suit for rent and ejectment against Parmanand and others, claiming rent on the basis of Rs. 20/-, before the Munsif. During the pendency of the said suit, the parties entered into a compromise on 17th Jan. 68, and it was agreed that the defendants would pay Rs. 30/- per month as rent, w.e.f. 1st Mar. 67, and it was further agreed by the defendants that they would vacate the premises in dispute by the end of 1970. On the basis of this compromise, the learned Munsif, on 9th Feb. 68, decreed the suit. Thereafter, decree-holder Birdhichand and judgment-debtor Parmanand expired. An execution - petition was filed by Jankivallabh and the legal representatives of Birdhichand, against the petitioner Devdutta Dheer, who is legal representative of deceased Parmanand. An objection-petition was filed by (he petitioner, and it was objected that there was a fresh contract of tenancy executed between the pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document