SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Raj) 254

S.C.BHARGAVA
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Vijai Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.K. Singhi, for Petitioner; K.S. Rathore, for State

BHARGAVA, J. Heard Shri J.K. Singhi, learned counsel for the petitioner who has been appointed under the Legal Aid Scheme. The petitioner Manoharlal submitted a detailed representation running into seven pages along with several documents which were treated as writ petition; affixation of court fees etc. was dispensed with and a show cause notice was issued to the Director General of Police as to why the investigation should not be got done by the Central Bureau of Investigation. The State of Rajasthan has filed the reply to the show cause notice along with certain documents including the final report submitted by the police on 31-8-83.

2. The petitioners daughter Smt. Madhu Bala died on 2-10-82. On 1st October, 1982, Vijai Lal informed the petitioner telegraphically that Smt. Madhu Balas condition was serious and when the petitioner reached Ajmer, he was told by accused Durgalal and Suraj that Smt. Madhu Bala has been burnt and she has been admitted in the Hospital. Thereafter, he went to the Hospital and saw Smt. Madhu Bala who indicated to the petitioner that she has been burnt. The Medical Jurist made a report at the Police Station. In the Post Mortem Report, it has been mention



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top