SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Raj) 276

P.C.JAIN
Bool Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ayodhyalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Gupta, for Appellant; R.S. Kejariwal, for Respondent

P.C. JAIN, J.—This second appeal under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 21st May, 1982, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Ajmer, in Civil Appeal No. 242 of 1976 (12 of 1977), affirming the judgment and decree dated 17th November, 1976, passed by the learned Addl. Munsiff, Ajmer City, in Civil Suit No. 60 of 1969 (6 of 1973).

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit for injunction restraining the defendant from making any construction over the land or from interfering in any manner in his possession over the disputed land. The case of the plaintiff is that he is the owner of the disputed plot and he has possession over it. The defendant contested the suit, denying that the disputed plot belongs to the plaintiff. He contended that the disputed land is a part of his property and the western boundary of his property extends to the disputed land. The Trial Court after appreciating the evidence dismissed the suit of the plaintiff vide judgment and decree dated 12th November, 1973. The Trial Court gave a finding that the plaintiff failed to prove his title and possession over the disputed la
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top