SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 152

J.R.CHOPRA, S.S.BYAS
Gordhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Singhvi, for Appellants; L.S. Udawat, Public Prosecutor.

BYAS, J.—The appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner dated October 23, 1975, by which the six accused, namely. Gordhan, Basta Ram, Ramlal, Kishna Ram, Hanuman Ram and Ram Chandra were convicted under sections 302/149, 148 and 323/149, I.P.C. and each was sentenced to imprisonment for life on the first count and six months rigorous imprisonment on the remaining two counts. The sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Put briefly, the prosecution case is that the deceased Balusingh Rajput was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Udasar P.S. Nokha district Bikaner. Accused Gordhan was a Panch in the Gram Panchayat. Five members of the Panchayat were on the side of accused Gordhan while seven members of the Panchayat were the supporters of the deceased-victim. As a result, two parties came to be formed in village Udasar-one headed by the deceased-victim and the other headed by the accused Gordhan. The State of Rajasthan allotted a major portion of pasture land of village Udasar to the Forest Department. It is alleged that the deceased Balusingh was an instrument in getting this allotment of land to the Forest Department. This was resented and prot


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top