D.L.MEHTA
Shamsher – Appellant
Versus
Rustam – Respondent
2. The purchaser plaintiff-appellant move an application under O. 39 R. 1 and C.P.C. that an injunction may be issued prohibiting the defendant-respondents not to interfere with their lawful possession. The learned court below considering the provisions of Section 37 and the decision of the Madras High Court in a case of Krishnamoorty Koundar Vs. Paramasive Koundar (1) held that temporary injunction cannot be granted to enable the vendee to protect his possession. The Madras High Court was of the view that in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale by the prospective vendee, such vendee can not be grande temporary injunction to enable him to protect his possession only on the basis of the terms of the agreement that he was given possession of the property on the date of agreement of sale unless the truth of delivery of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.