MOHINI KAPUR
Ballabh Das – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Chand Gupta – Respondent
2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass. The plaintiff appellant advanced a sum of Rs. 18,000/-on 1.4.1968, for which a pronote and receipt was executed by respondent no. 1. This pronote describes the borrower as Rajesh Chand Gupta s/o Harish Chandra Gupta, c/o Delhi Sanitary Stores, Choura Rasta, Jaipur. The pronote has been signed by Rajesh Chand Gupta with out specifying as to the capacity in which he has put his signatures. On 8 6.1969, a sum of Rs. 5,000/- was paid towards the loan by Rajesh Chand Gupta and he made an endorsement to this effect on the reverse of the pronote. The allegation of the plaintiff appellant was that the money had been obtained by Rajesh Chand Gupta in his capacity as partner of M/s Delhi Sanitary Stores, and this firm as well as the other partner Shri S. C Gupta were also liable for the amount which remained unpaid. The suit was instituted on 3. 10. 1974 and in order to bring the suit within limitation, extensio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.