SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 233

S.N.BHARGAVA
Gordhan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.R. Calla, for Appellant; M. Rafiq, for Respondents

S.N. BHARGAVA, J.—This is plaintiffs second appeal.

2. The plaintiff was working as Male Nurse Grade-III at M.B.S. Hospital, Kota. He was served with a memorandum dated 28.7.1970 along with a charge sheet, and an enquiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the CCA Rules) was proposed to be held against him. The allegation against the appellant was that on 29. 5. 70 he pointed out Shri Murli Manohar Moondra to three persons who lateron gave beating to Shri Moondra. Enquiry was held under Rule 16 of the CCA Rules, and after the enquiry was over under Rule 16 of the CCA Rules, without any notice to the appellant regarding the change of procedure from Rule 16 to Rule 17 of the CCA Rules, a minor penalty of stoppage of two grade increments without future effect was straightaway imposed against the appellant, without calling any explanation from him and without furnishing him even copy of the enquiry report. Plaintiff in his plaint further alleged that the enquiry was held in breach of principles of natural justice and the charge does not refer to his conduct as an employee and had nothing to do with th


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top