I.S.ISRANI
Municipal Council, Bharatpur – Appellant
Versus
Gokul Chand – Respondent
2. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and also pursed the impugned order as well as the law cited at the bar.
3. The contention of Mr. G.K. Garg, appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that an application was filed on 6. 12. 1983 for bringing 3 documents on record, all of which are certified copies of judgments of various courts and therefore, are above suspicion. The application was rejected by the learned trial court on the ground that it is belated and that the affidavit filed in support of the application was not in terms of the application itself and no reasonable cause has been shown for filing the documents late. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel that the judgments relate to a suit filed against Brijlal father of the plaintiff non-petitioner No, 1, by one Rehimulla. The judgments relate regarding the disputed land and the case was decided against Brijlal who filed an appeal and revision, which wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.