SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 304

J.S.VERMA, I.S.ISRANI
Virendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Santoshi Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P. Garg, for Petitioner; P.N. Agarwal and V.K. Agarwal, for Respondent

I.S. ISRANI, J. — This D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed against the judgment dated 18-9-86 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 422/86. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights was filed by the respondent in the Court of learned District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur. The appellant husband has denied the factum of marriage with the respondent, An application filed by the respondent for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed by the trial Court. Against this an appeal was filed before the learned Single Judge of this Court which was accepted and after setting aside the order of the trial Court, the matter was remanded back for retrial in the light of observations made in it. The appellant filed a special appeal against the decision of learned Single Judge which has also been dismissed by this Court.

2. In the meanwhile when the case was remanded by the learned Single Judge to the trial Court, the respondent filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for maintenance of pendente-lite. The




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top