SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 77

JASRAJ CHOPRA
Pirag Chand – Appellant
Versus
Firm Randal Chananmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Shreemali, for Petitioner

JAS RAJ CHOPRA J.—This revision arises out of an order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Mo. 2, Sri Ganganagar dated 18/8/87 whereby the learned trial Court has dismissed the application of the petitioner filed u/O. 9. R. 7. CPC.

2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal briefly stated, are : that the plaintiff firm Ramlal Chananmal of Sri Ganganagar filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 35360/- against defendant firm Kailash Flour Mill & Oil Mill and the petitioner Shri Pirag Chand on the ground that defendant No, 2 Pirag Chand gave out himself, as the owner and partner of this shop and it is he defendant No. 2 who has entered into some cotton contracts with the plaintiff firm prior to 17-4-78 and on that day, after settling the accounts, he executed a Rukka in favour of the plaintiff for an outstanding amount of Rs. 26000/-. It is. therefore, claimed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover this amount along with interest from the defendants.

3. The summons of the suit were served on both the defendants. The suit was filed on 24/3/81 and the summons of the suit were served on the defendants prior to 17/11/81. Shri Bheekam Chand Jain, Advocate put in







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top