SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 301

M.B.SHARMA
Kumari Usha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Indermal & Sons – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C. Rastogi, for Petitioners; Akbar Khan, for Non-petitioners

M.B. SHARMA, J.—The revision petition has been filed against be order dated October 15,1982, of the learned Additional District Judge No. 1 Alwar. Under the aforesaid order the learned Addl. District Judge allowed the applica-tion by the defendant non petitioners under Sec. 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and further proceedings in the case were stayed during the decision of civil suit No. 58/80.

2. The petitioners filed a suit in the court of learned District Judge, Alwar in which a prayer was made for dissolution of firm and for accounts of the firm since October 10 1979 to April 30, 1980 and also thereafter. The aforesaid suit was filed against the non-petitioners No 1 to 3. An application for appointment of Receiver was also filed under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC. In that suit on behalf of the non petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 an application under Sec. 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 for short, (the Act) was filed praying that the proceedings in the suit be stayed. That application was contested on behalf of the petitioner and after hearing learned counsel for the parties the learned District Judge under order dated August 27, 1980 dismissed the application under Sec. 34 of the Act. The n






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top