SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 241

N.M.KASLIWAL
Shagufta Yashmin – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Saeed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.A. Naqvi, for Petitioner; R.S. Rathore, for Non-petitioner

N.M. KASLIWAL, J. — Both these revisions are disposed of by one single order as identical question of law is involved in both these cases.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Mohammad Saeed and Mohammad Shafiq who are real brothers were married to Shagufta Yashmin and Shabana Tabassum who are also real sisters. Mohammad Saeed filed suit No. 122/1979 and Mohammad Shafiq filed civil suit No 121/1979 for restitution of conjugal rights and injunction in the Court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Karauli. In both the cases an objection was raised that the suit was not maintainable in the Court at Karauli. The trial court had framed six issues out of which issue No. 3 was with regard to the jurisdiction of the Karauli Court. The trial court considered the said issue as a preliminary issue and allowed the parties to lead evidence. The plaintiff in support of his case examined two witnesses and the defendant examined six witnesses. The learned trial court then heard the arguments on issue No 3 and held that both the parties were living at Jaipur and as such returned the suit for presentation to proper court. Aggrieved against the aforesaid order the plan tiff filed appeals in







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top