SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 76

MOHINI KAPUR
Prabhu Chawla – Appellant
Versus
Shivnath Soni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Sarin, for Petitioners; S.K. Sharma, for Non-petitioners; R. Alvi, P.P.

MOHINI KAPUR, J.—In this revision petition, the scope and meaning of some person aggrieved in Section 199 Cr.P.C. is to be examined. The Additional C.J.M., Kota, has taken cognizance, upon a complaint, filed by the non-petitioner one Shri Srinath Soni, who is the President of Instrumentation, Workers Union (Intuc) Kota, for the alleged defamation of the President and the Prime Minister of this Country. An article published in the Hindi version of India Today, dated 28th Feb. 1987, under the heading Khatarnak Takrav is the writing on basis of which the petitioners, who are the Senior Editor, Chief Editor and the Printer of the magazine, are being proceeded against for the offences under Sections 500, 501 and 502 IPC.

2. By this order it is not to be decided whether the words written in the article amount to defamation or not, so the contents may be seen in brief only. The President of India is said to be merely a Rubber Stamp and the Prime Minister is said to be an inexperienced person. The strained relation between the President and the Prime Minister is the basis on which the political situation has been discussed.

3. The learned Addl. C J.M. recorded the statement of the complainan
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top