SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 245

ASHOK KUMAR, R.S.VERMA
Bhupal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R. Singhi, for Petitioner R.P. Vyas, Addl. Govt. Advocate

;kph Hkwikyflag us ;g ;kfpdk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds v/khu izLrqr dh gSA

2- la{ksi esa ;kph dk i{k dFku gS fd og kkjhfjd :i ls fodykax O;fDr gS vkSj mlus Lo;a dks ftyk fu;kstu dk;kZy; fljksgh esa iathd`r djok j[kk FkkA ftyk vk;qosZn vf/kdkjh fljksgh ds v/khu okMZ ckW; ds dqN in fjDr FksA bu inksa ij p;u gsrq ,d p;u lfefr xfBr gqbZ vkSj bl p;u lfefr }kjk ;kph ,oa vU; dqN izR;kfk;ksa dks mDr in ds fy;s p;fur dj fy;k x;kA bl p;u ds QyLo:i ftyk vk;qosZn vf/kdkjh fljksgh us vius vknsk fnukad 1-5-85 ¼layXud la[;k 2½ }kjk ;kph ,oa dqN vU; izR;kfk;ksa dks okMZ ckW; ds in ij fu;qDr dj fn;kA ;kph us mDr fu;qfDr i= dh vuqikyuk esa fnukad 2-5-85 dks jktdh; vk;qosZfnd fpfdRlky; lqFkM+h esa okMZ ckW; dk in xzg.k dj fy;kA rnqijkUr fnukad 17-8-85 dks ftyk vk;qosZn vf/kdkjh fljksgh us ;kph dks jktLFkku lsok fu;e 1955 ds fu;e 23&, ds v/khu ,d uksfVl ¼layXud 3½ fn;kA bl uksfVl }kjk ;kph dh lsok;sa 19-9-85 ls lekIr djus dk izLrko FkkA blds ipkr~ fnukad 16-9-85 dks jktdh; vk;qosZfnd fpfdRlky; lqFkM+h us ;kph dks ,d fyf[kr vknsk ¼layXud&4½ ns dj fnukad 17-9-85 ls okMZ ckW; ds in ls dk;Z eqDr dj fn;kA

3- ;kph dk i{k dFku gS fd bl ekeys esa tks p;u lwph rS;kj gqbZ] mlesa ojh;rk esa ;kph Øekad 16















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top