SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 269

G.K.SHARMA
R. L. Bhatnagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagdeep Dhankar & Praveen Balwada, for Appellant; Rizwan Alvi, Public Prosecutor

G.K. SHARMA, J.—-This appeal has been preferred against the judgement dated 22rid Oct. 77, passed by the Special Judge for ACD-Cases, Jaipur by which, the appellant has been convicted u/s. 161, IPC and sentenced to I years simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 1 months simple imprisonment; and u/s. 5(1) (d) 2) of Prevention of Corruption Act (for short, "the Act"), to 1 years simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 1 months simple imprisonment. Both the sentences were, however, ordered to run concurrently.

2. The appellant was working as Office Superintendent in the Office of CM & HO, Maharani Bhim Singh Hospital, Kota. On 18th Dec, 73, one Labhchand, at about 8. 15 AM lodged a written - report before the Additional Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption Department, Kota (for short,the ASP), alleging therein that he was transferred from the Office of CM & HO, Kota, to that of District Medical and Health Officer, Kota, and he had joined duties there on 13th Nov., 73. His service - book and other relevant documents which were sent by the CM & HO, Kota, were not co



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top