NAVIN CHANDRA SHARMA
Bastichand Bhansali – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Vir Kalia – Respondent
2. Plaintiff Bastichand Bhansali is an Advocate practising at Jodhpur. He instituted Civil Suit No. 589 of 1976 against the respondent for his ejectment from the dismissed premises detailed and described in para No. 1 of his plaint. Ejectment of the defendant-respondent was claimed on the ground that the plaintiff requires the demised premises for the use and occupation of himself and his family and also for using it for his professional purpose as an Advocate. It was alleged that the plaintiff was residing in tenanted premises situated near Singh Pol Jodhpur. He has his office in Cloth Market also in rented premises.
3. The suit was contested by the defendant. The defendant pleaded in his written statement that he was residing in the suit premises since the year 1960. He denied that the plaintiff reasonably and bonafidely required the suit premises for his personal use. It was alleged that the suit premises previously belo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.