SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 103

M.B.SHARMA, I.S.ISRANI
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagdeep Dhankar, Anil Chaudhary & Praveen Balvada, for Petitioners; V.L. Mathur, for Respondents

M.B. SHARMA, J.—The petitioner has challenged the legality and pro-priety of the order Annr. 4 dated July 5, 1988, made by the Director, Local Bodies Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. The said order is available at pages 34 and 35 of the paper book of the writ petition and a perusal of which will show that an application under Sec. 300 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (for short the Act) was filed before the Director, Local Bodies and the Director Local Bodies in exercise of the powers under Sec. 300 of the Act made an interim order ordering to maintain the status quo and further ordering that no permission to construct should be given on the land in dispute Before we deal with the aforesaid order Annr. 6, it will be useful to give relevant facts.

2. One Mangal Singh, father of the petitioner filed a civil suit in the court of Addl. Munsif Magistrate No. 1 Dholpur for declaration and perpetual injunction against the Municipal Board Dholpur in respect of the land in dispute. The necessity for filing the suit arose as the Municipal Board intend to auction the land in question and in that suit an application for temporary injunction was also filed which was allowed. The suit wa




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top