SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 112

M.C.JAIN
Bhanwarlal – Appellant
Versus
Tejmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Shishodia, for Petitioner; H.C. Jain, for Non-petitioners

MILAP CHANDRA, J.—This revision petition has been filed against the order of the Civil Judge, Barmer dated December 1, 1986 by which he has held that the sale-deed dated April 14, 1980 executed by the petitioner Bhanwarlal in favour of the non-petitioner Babulal on stamp papers of total value of Rs. 394/-is not duly stamped and has impounded it under Sec. 38, Stamp Act. The facts of the case giving rise to this revision petition may be summarised thus.

2. The plaintiff non-petitioner No. 1 has filed Suit No. 17/82 for declaration and possession in the Court of the Civil Judge, Barmer against the petitioner Bhanwarlal and other non-petitioners. The said sale-deed was tendered in evidence during the statement of defendant-petitioner Bhanwarlal D. W. 1. Application, paper No. B54/1, was moved by the plaintiff-non-petitioner Tejmal that the stamps of the sale-deed have been purchased on different dates, they bear different numbers, they have not been used within six months of their purchase and as such the sale-deed is not duly stamped. It has been prayed that the sale-deed be impounded and requisite stamp duty and penalty be realised before taking it in evidence After hearing the learn















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top