M.C.JAIN
Legal Representatives of Jasraj – Appellant
Versus
Dhingarmal – Respondent
2. The plaintiff-non-petitioner filed a suit for injunction and demolition of the construction raised by the defendant-petitioner on the disputed land in respect of which a patta was granted to him by the Gram Panchayat, Siwana. In support of his case, the defendant-petitioner filed the patta granted to him and wanted to get if exhibited. The plaintiff-non-petitioner raised an objection that the patta was granted for over Rs. 100/-, it was compulsorily registrable and as such it cannot be exhibited as it is not registered under the Registration Act. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, the learned Munsif passed the impugned order.
3. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner that the patta was granted by the Gram Panchayat for and on behalf of the Government of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.