SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 389

D.L.MEHTA
Durga Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Kejriwal, for Petitioner; M.M. Ranjan, for Non-petitioners

D.L. MEHTA, J.—Petitioner preferred this revision petition being aggrieved with the order dated 2nd August, 1984 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jhunjhunu Suit was instituted for the recovery of the rent, interest and ejectment etc. in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Jhunjhunu. The valuation of civil suit was assessed as Rs. 8,727/- on account of arrears and interest. The suit was also valued for the purpose of ejectment and the valuation was fixed as Rs, 1,608/- Thus, the total valuation was Rs. 10,335/- and the court fee was also paid on the same amount. An application was moved for the amendment of the plaint and it was mentioned in that application that the petitioner wants to give away the relief relating to the rent for the period 1st March, 1975 to 31st October, 1975. Petitioner also gave away the relief of interest. Thus; the valuation of the suit was reduced by abandoning/giving up the relief relating to rent and interest referred above. An application under 0.6 R.17 C.P.C. was moved by the petitioner and the same has been rejected by the trial-court.

2. Being aggrieved with the order dated 2nd August, 1984 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jhunjhunu, this revision pe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top