SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 406

A.K.MATHUR
Kaushalya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Purohit, for Petitioner; S.L. Jam, for Respondents

A.K. MATHUR, J.—All these five writ petitions involve a similar question of law and fact, therefore, they are disposed of by a common order.

2. For the convenient disposal of all the writ petitions, the facts given in the case Balkishan Vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition no 791/8.9 are taken into consideration.

3. Petitioner is in possession of a plot of land situated between Krishi Upaj Mandi and F.C.I. Godown near Lalgarh Railway Station. This area is within the municipality of Bikaner and is situated in the area. The area is Kachchi Basti and is known as Indira Nagar Kachchi Basti. This is part of revenue village Beechwali. It is submitted that the State Government has issued from time to time notification and circulars for regularising the possession of these persons who are found in possession of the land at a particular date specified in the notification. Such regularisation was forgery done by the Municipality for Nazul lands lying within their jurisdiction. Thereafter this jurisdiction was conferred upon the Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner in relation to the lands within their jurisdiction. Petitioner applied for the regularisation of his land before the Urban I


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top