SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 437

M.B.SHARMA
Gokul – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan (70) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Hasan, for Petitioners G.C. Chatterjee, Public Prosecutor, for State.

M.B. SHARMA, J.—The papers (copies furnished under Section 173 Cr.P.C. available with the learned counsel for the petitioners are not legible. I fail to understand as to what is the relevancy to furnish such documents to the advocates which are not legible to the accused persons. The advocates should refuse to take such documents unless they are legible so that they may discharge their duties without being afraid to anybody, including the Presiding Officers of the courts. I have no option but to call for the case diary for disposal of the bail application.

2. The Public Prosecutor is directed to send for the case diary and the case may be put for a orders after seven days. The courts must see that legible copies only are furnished to the accused persons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top