SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 212

M.B.SHARMA, I.S.ISRANI
Aftab Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India (145) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. S. Mehta, for Petitioner N. K. Maloo, for Respondents.

M.B. SHARMA, J.—The case of the petitioner is that those Class IV employees, who have passed Higher Secondary Examination from Central Board of Higher Education, New Delhi, have been promoted to the post of Assistant Grade III from Class IV. The petitioner is senior to them and had also acquired the same qualification, but his case for promotion despite several representations, has not been considered.

2. Notice of the petition was given to the non-petitioners and reply was filed, wherein the non-petitioners have come out with a case that the said Central Board of Higher Education, New Delhi is only a private institution and has not been recognised by the Central Government or State 3overnment. In support of this plea raised in the reply they have placed reliance on Annexure-R/3 press note from which it appears that it had been notified to all that private institution registered on March 27, 1856 under the name of the Central Board of Higher Education has not been recognised by the Government of India and is not a recognised institution. The public has been informed that the said Board should not be mistaken as Central Board of Secondary Education, which is a Government recognised e



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top