SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 203

N.C.KOCHHAR
Bebi Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan (70) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Jain, for Petitioner O.P. Garg, for Respondents

N.C. KOCHHAR, J.— The facts giving rise to this revision filed by the plaintiff are as under:-

2. A suit had been filed by the plaintiff stating that she had been appointed as class IV employee of the State of Rajasthan (defendant No.l) vide order dated 10.6.1985 passed by the Addl. Collector Development, Alwar (defendant no. 2) for the period ending 31.7.1985, but her term of employment was extended from time to time and she continued working on her post till 18.9.1988, but when she reached her office on 19.9.1988, she was not allowed to work in the office and was orally informed that her services stood terminated with effect from 19.9.1988. It was stated that the action of the defendants in not allowing her to continue working in her job, was illegal and it was prayed that the defendants be directed by way of a permanent injunction to allow her to continue in her job and to continue paying her salary. Along with the plaint, an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) was also filed by the plaintiff praying that during the pendency of the suit a temporary injunction be issued directing the defendants to allow her to join the duty. The suit






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top