SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 168

I.S.ISRANI
Hari Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan (130) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Mehta, for Petitioner Virendra Lodha, for Respondents L.K. Sharma Deputy Government Advocate

I.S. ISRANI, J.—This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the petitioner may be allowed to continue on the post of driver with all consequential benefits.

2. It is submitted by Mr. R.S. Mehta, learned counsel, that petitioner is working in substantive capacity on post of Cleaner and was asked to render the services of the Driver from August 13, 1983 and was assigned the job of driving heavy vehicles. A copy of order in this respect (Annex.1) dated April 25, 1984 has been placed on record. The driving licence of heavy vehicles has been filed and marked as Anx. 2. It is pointed out that since the petitioner was not paid the emoluments of a driver, a D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 910/88 was filed in this court by the petitioner, which was disposed of on December 22, 1988, by which, the petition was allowed and it was directed that the petitioner be paid the minimum basic salary of the post of driver from March, 1986 on the principle of equal wages for equal work. It is further pointed out that respondent No.3, Mr. V.D. Vyas Commissioner, Municipal Council, Ajmer, was involved in embezzlement case and Anti-Corruption Department conducted an enquiry in the same and the case has






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top