SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 14

B.R.ARORA
Bhim Sen – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S. Sandhu, for Petitioner V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor

B.R. ARORA, J.—This petition under sec. 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings pending against him and his other fourteen partners in the court of the Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh.

2. M/s. Bhim Sen and party was granted liquor contract for the retail sale of liquor for Group-Shops at Suratgarh, Raisinghnagar and Padampur for the period from April 1, 1987 to March 31, 1989. The petitioner is one of the partners of M/s Bhim Sen and party. According to the prosecution, the main shop of M/s Bhim Sen and Party situated at Anoopgarh, was searched on Aug. 9, 1988 by the Excise Inspector Suratgarh, and at the time of search, 155 bottles of simple liquor and eight bottles of rose-liquor were found. This stock was less than the required stock and according to the Excise Inspector, the petitioner, thus, contravened the condition for the liquor licence as he was required to keep in stock atleast 15 days stock. Though the inspection was made on August 9, 1988, but the charge-sheet with respect to this offence was filed in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh, against sixteen persons, who are partners of M/s Bhim Sen and party on




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top