SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 113

B.R.ARORA
Mahaveer Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R. Singhi and Suresh Kumbhat, for Petitioner Madhusudan Naraina Bhatt, for Non-petitioner No. 2 D.R. Bohra, Public Prosecutor.

Honble B.R. ARORA, J.—The petitioner Mahaveer Prasad and C.P. Vasnaiye are facing trial under Sections 332 and 324 I.P.C. in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, Durga Dutt, on June 16, 1984 lodged a First information Report at Police Station. Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur against C.P. Vasnaiye and Mahaveer Prasad under Sections 353 and 332 I.P.C. The police, after necessary investigation, presented the challan against both the accused in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, under Section 324 and 332 I.P.C. On the submission of the challan, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1 Jodhpur, on July 21, 1984, ordered for the registration of the case. After the submission of the challan, the accused petitioner moved an application under Section 197 Cr.P.C. that as they are the public servants and, therefore, their prosecution without prior sanction from the competent authority is without jurisdiction. That application, filed under Section 197 Cr.P.C, filed by the petitioners, was dismissed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, by his order dated January 4, 1988. Dissatisfied with the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top