SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 51

R.S.VERMA
Nathiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Doongar Singh and Mahesh Bishnoi for appellants S.G. Ojha and B.S. Bhati P.P. for State.

Honble R.S. VERMA, J.—The learned Addl- Sessions Judge, Barmer has convicted the appellants Saffiya and Nathiya for offence u/s 20 (II) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and has sentenced each one of them to undergo R.I. for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,00,000/- each and in default to undergo further R.I. for one year each. Aggrieved, Saffiya and Nathiya have come in appeal.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution story is that on 28. 2. 87 P.W. 5 Hamir Singh was posted as S.H.O., Police Station, Sheo. That day he was informed by the Superintendent of Police, Barmer that the latter had been informed by an informer that Nathiya and Saffiya were proceeding on two camels with contraband charas. Upon this information from the Superintendent of Police, Barmer, Shri Hamir Singh alongwith Dy. S.P. Govind Narayan, Head Constables Bijraj Singh and Heera Ram, Head Constable of C. I. D. Umaid Singh and other Police officials, namely, Girdhari Singh, Tajmal Singh, Kishan Singh and Pratapdan proceeded in Govt. jeep in search of the two persons towards village Dholakiya. In this connection, Hamir Singh before proceeding to Dholkiya, r










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top