SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 77

Y.R.MEENA
Rajendra – Appellant
Versus
State of. Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Bishnoi, for Petitioner S.M. Singhvi, P.P.

Honble Y.R. MEENA, J.—This revision petition is directed against the judgment of learned District and Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated 17-12-81, where by he sustained the conviction of accused petitioner under s. 25 of Indian Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine, further undergo one months rigorous imprisonment.

2. The facts, in short, are that on 20-4-80 at 2 a.m. Budharam (P.W. 1) reported at Police Station, Ghamoorwali that in Murabba No. 34 of 62 NLP land measuring 2 bighas and 12 biswas was allotted to Ram Pratap. He is nephew of Ram Pratap. Ram Pratap had given him power of attorney in respect of that land and he has cultivating it. A suit was filed by one Hari Ram and in that suit allotment of land in the name of Ram Pratap was cancelled. He went in appeal against that order and stay order was obtained but inspite of the stay order, tehsildar gave possession of this land to Ram Narayan. On 19-4-80, when turn for water came for irrigation, he along-with Shri Ram and Pritam Singh went to the field at about 8.40 p.m. Ram Narayan, his sons Rajendra and Vinod were already there. Budhram




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top