SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 333

N.C.SHARMA
Sunil Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan (64) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Jain, for Petitioner Naresh Goyal, Public Prosecutor

SHARMA, J. — This is a second bail application by Sunil Chaturvedi, u/Sec. 439, Cr.P.C. His first bail application was rejected by this Court on 12th Mar. 91. When the previous bail application was heard, the counsel for the petitioner had urged that the provisions of Sec. 50 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, were not complied with by the SHO. With regard to that, this Court had observed that objection could be dealt with by the trial court, and that the trial court would decide that objection first. However, it appears from the order of the Sessions Judge, Kota, that he was of the view that the question can be decided only after evidence is recorded, and prima facie it was found that compliance of Sec. 50 had been made.

(2). It has to be kept in view that punishment for offences u/Sec. 8/21 of the NDPS Act, extends to a period not less than ten years, but, it can extend to twenty years; and further, a fine, not less than Rs. 1,00,000/- is imposed. There is also provision in Sec. 37 of the Act that no person accused of offence punishable for a term of imprisonment of five years or more under the Act shall be released on bail, unless where the Public Prosecut










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top