TIBREWAL, J. — All the above three matters are connected and arise from a civil suit for partition No. 21/73, as such, they may be disposed of by a common order.

(2). Civil Revision No. 747/90 (Smt. Shyama Devi & Others v/s. Manju Shukla & Others) and Civil Revision No. 831/90 (Tewari Ganga Prasad V/s Smt. Manju Sukla) are against the order dated 13.7.1990 of Additional District Judge No. 3 Jaipur City, Jaipur passed on the application dt. 6.5.1990 of non-petitioner Smt. Manju Shukla.

(3). Civil Misc. Appeal No. 330/90 (Smt. Shyama Devi & Others) v/s Smt. Manju Shukla & others) is against the order dt. 13-7-1990 of Addl. District Judge No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Misc. Case No. 48/90 on an application of respondent Smt. Manju Shukla under order 39 rule 1 and 2 C.P.C.

(4). In order to appreciate the real dispute between the parties, it would be convenient to reproduce the pedigree of the parties as under :—

PEDIGREE

Pt. Purandar Ramj

Shiv Prasanna Ramji

Kalka Prasadji Gadadhar Prasadji Mohan Lalji Dhanpat Ram (Plaintiff)

Bhagwandeenji

Ganga Prasad(Def. No.1) Jamna Prasad(Def. No.2) Syryakumar @ Chunnilalji Yagyadutt Narain @ Munnilal (Def. No.5)

Mahendra Kumar(Def.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document