SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 133

R.S.KEJRIWAL
Chhagan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Babu (27) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Sharma, for Defendant-appellant S.K. Keshote, for Plaintiff-respondent

KEJRIWAL, J.—This Civil Misc. Appeal under Sec. 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 has been filed against the order dated 12.3.92 passed by the Addl. District Judge No. 1, Bharatpur determining the provisional rent of the disputed shop at the rate of Rs.l00/- per month under sec. 13 (3) of the aforesaid Act.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-respondent filed a civil suit No. 46/91 before the aforesaid Court with the allegations that the appellant took the disputed shop on rent at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month, that the appellant did not pay rent from 1-4-1988 to 31-5-1991 and thus committed default in payment of rent; that the shop was let out for the purposes of selling cycle parts but the defendant-appellant without the permission of the plaintiff-respondent started the work of repairing of cycles, that the behaviour of the appellant is very rude and that the appellant has created nuisance. In support of his case that the rent was agreed at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month, the plaintiff-respondent submitted affidavits of himself and also of Banwari Lal and Prem Kumar. The defendant-appellant in his written statement denied the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top