SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 87

M.C.JAIN
Sunil Talwar Murlidhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajesh Balia, Advocate, for the petitioners R.C. Maheshwari, Advocate, for the Non-petitioners

JAIN, J.—This writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents (i) to allow remission of Rs. 24,43,449/- for the months of October a.11.1990, during which the petitioners were not able to open their liquor shops due to curfew, (ii) not to adjust any amount from the security amounts and (iii) not to cancel the licence on account of the non-payment of the said amount. The fact of the case giving rise to this writ petition may be summarised thus.

(2) The petitioner No. 1 was granted licences under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (hereinafter to be called the Act) for the period from April 1, 1989 to March 31, 1991 for the exclusive privilege for selling country liquor on 75 shops and 45 sub-shops. Curfew was imposed in the entire municipal limits of Jodhpur from October 24 to November 19, 1990. As a result thereof, the liquor shops could not be operated at all during the curfew periods. There was proportionate loss in retail sale of liquor . By letter dated November 1990 (Annexure 4), respondents were requested to grant remission of the said amount of Rs.24,43,449/-. It is apprehended that the demand for the said amount may be raised and it may be deducted from their security






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top