SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 63

S.N.BHARGAVA
Satya Narain Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Board of Secondary Education (137) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhanwar Bagri, Advocate, for Petitioners Ajay Rastogi, Advocate, for Respondent

BHARGAVA, J.—All these writ petitions involve similar facts and therefore, are being disposed of by this common order.

(2) Taking the facts of Writ Petition No. 5154 of 1991 Satya Narain vs. Board of Secondary Education.

(3) As per the facts mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner passed his Secondary School Examination in first division in the year 1989 and appeared in Senior Higher Secondary (Academic) Examination; 1991 with Roll No. 8514, conducted by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as the respondent Board). The centre of examination was Vivekanand Secondary School, Dausa. The petitioner received a communication dated 19.7.91 in which the petitioner was alleged to have copied from answer books of some other examinees in one paper viz., Biology-II Part A and was shown to be guilty of using unfair means and that the Results Committee had found a prima facie case and therefore, the petitioner was asked to submit his explanation by 2-8-1991, and present himself before the Enquiry Officer on 7.8.91. The petitioner was also directed to produce any documentary evidence on 7-8-91. The petitioner submitted his written explanation in reply



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top